De-Weapon­izing “Prepared by Science”

I must open this piece by clarifying three things off the top: I agree that strict measures were needed in an attempt to stem the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Further, action or not, there are many intricate concerns about how to equitably distribute the pain of the pandemic. Even more, there are deeply difficult questions about how alternative courses of action may trade off lives lost to coronavirus against broad and deep disruption of human well-being (which may itself result in lives lost).

This piece is about none of that.

As the pandemic accelerated, a certain Texas politician made a tweet calling for stronger societal restrictions. In itself, I found this to be a good thing. Yet there was a certain phrase in the tweet, or more specifically, implications behind the phrase — “prepared by science” — that I believe endanger our collective ability to guide society by clear thinking. I’ve masked certain details in the image of the tweet because I do not wish to vilify the politician, nor do I wish to critique the study it points to (just yet). I do wish to vilify the tweet itself.

But…sigh…I must hasten to interject more clarifications:

• I’m fine with an expedient use of the phrase; I won’t pick on the fact that there is no entity “science” that prepares anything. The phrase can be a useful shorthand. Fine.
• I’m all for good science. “Good” is the key word.
• I don’t know (and am not focusing on) the tweeter’s actual understanding of the phrase.
• My concerns are with the implications of the phrase when it is thrown around in this way and with its treacherous effect on the civility of society.My concerns are with the implications of the phrase when it is thrown around in this way and with its treacherous effect on the civility of society.

By the by, I should say why I feel compelled to insert these clarifications. The acceleration of certain peoples’ stridency and aggression in beating the drums of their political doctrines has advanced to the point where any petty troll might pluck out a phrase, ignore the thrust of what I’m saying, and then shoot and stab at windmills. I’d like to save such trolls the trouble and embarrassment.

Anyway, in the language of the tweet, the phrase “prepared by science” functions as an appeal to authority: “You should believe this because scientists say it is so.” If indeed good science supports it, indeed we should believe it, but an appeal to authority does not make it good science.

We could simply leave the tweet’s ad verecundiam fallacy at that but, in the context of a society (a) divided by what makes good science and (b) prone to using arguments that are more highly emotionalized than solidly reasoned, the tweet’s appeal to authority carries an insidious implication: If you don’t agree with the tweet’s call to action, you must be anti-science. Tossed around the way it is, the phrase weaponizes the tweet. It tends not only to cut off debate, but to shame and pillory any who might dare to take issue with its call to action.

TASCHEN art books: Advertisement

Leonardo: The Complete Paintings and Drawings For the 500th anniversary of the death of Leonardo da Vinci, this updated edition of our XL title provides the most comprehensive survey of the life and work of the master painter, sculptor, architect, and inventor. The catalogue raisonné of paintings covers both surviving and lost works, while full-bleed details allow us to inspect even the subtlest brushstrokes that came to revolutionize art history.

National Geographic Infographics How do birds sing? What are the secrets of sleep? Who invented skis? With seven thematic chapters across earth and human science, this collection from National Geographic gathers the magazine's top infographics from the past 128 years into odyssey of discovery for all the family.

Cats Fashion has Helmut Newton, architecture has Julius Shulman, and cat photography has Walter Chandoha. In 1949, his encounter with a stray kitten blossomed into a career that elevated feline portraiture to an art form. This is a tribute not just to these beguiling creatures but also to a remarkable photographer who passed away in 2019 at the age of 98; and whose compassion can be felt in each and every frame.

Monet: The Triumph of Impressionism Claude Monet's Impressionist technique still inspires to this day. Whether it's his stunning Water Lilies series, or genre-defining Impression, Sunrise, discover what made Monet the master of French 19th-century art in this exuberant exploration of his life and work.

And not only this phrase in this tweet. Media, social media, and political conversations are rife with all manner of ad verecundiam appeals to science weaponized in the same way — and more clearly so, or even explicitly so. Ironically, and sadly, this type of dogmatic exclusion of civil discussion seems, in my experience, to often arise from voices that wish to be known by their grand tolerance for and deference to diversity. At least, it seems, diversity of selected types.

Let me not, however, merely vilify the tweet; I shall offer an alternative. Clearly, the tweeter was convinced by whatever is contained in the study pointed to. Fair enough; I respect that. The tweet might then say something such as this:

Framed this way, the tweet would allow debate. The tweeter would offer respect to tweet’s targets by allowing that they might Gifts and prints with our images Coffee mugs, t-shirts, phone cases, wall prints, and much more with our images. Shop at: Advertisement have a response, also based in science (or else bringing in a broader and more complete spectrum of public policy considerations), that draws a different conclusion. Framed this way, the tweet would seek a society based in civility and meritorious debate instead of, as it is, treading in shaming-based power plays of influential-might-makes-right.

Imagine all the people being better to each other that way. I hope to be, and I think I’m not the only one. I hope some day you’ll join us.

Postlude: Meritorious debate is all well and good, one might say, but this was a time for rapid action. Also fair enough. The tweeter’s intended urgency is a different matter, which I shall address in a separate piece.

Related posts

• They said “Science” — Did You Not Hear That? — Science is a beautiful tool, but well-meaning societal concern does not justify political advocacy masquerading as science.